1. The instant Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the appellantdefendant against the judgment and decree dated 22-7-1982 passed by District Judge, Bhatinda vide which while reversing the judgment and decree of the trial Court, suit of respondent No. 1-plaintiff was decreed and it was held that the parties to the suit are coparceners in the suit property which is their Joint Hindu Family property; and permanent injunction was granted to respondent No. 1 restraining the appellant from alienating the suit property without any legal necessity or other needs as contemplated under the Hindu Law.

2. The brief facts of the case are that plaintiff and defendant No. 2 and 3 are the sons of defendant No. 1. The plaintiff filed the instant suit for declaration and permanent injunction against his father impleading his other two brothers as defendants No. 2 and 3 to the effect that the land in dispute measuring 486 Kanals 5 Marias is their Joint Hindu Family property. It was alleged that the parties to the suit are coparceners having equal rights in the coparcenary property under the Hindu Law. It was further alleged that defendant No. 1 appellant is merely Karta of the family and