M.M.Kumar, J.

1. This petition Filed under Section 15(6) of the Haryana Urban (Control) of Rent and Eviction Act, 1973 (for brevity the Act) challenges order dated 18.4.1984 passed by the Appellate Authority, Namaul accepting the appeal of the tenant respondent in which the order dated 8.2.1984 passed by the Rent Controller, Namaul was challenged. The Rent Controller has allowed the application of the landlord-petitioner on the ground that tender of rent by him was not valid and, therefore, in accordance with the provisions of Section 13(2) of the Act, the tenant respondent was liable to be ejected.

2. Brief facts of the case necessary for deciding the controversy raised in the present petition are that the tenant-respondent was inducted in the demised premises as tenant @ Rs. 50/- per month vide rent deed dated 5.3.1996. The shop in dispute fell to the share of the landlord-petitioner and his brother one Kunj Lal, who is respondent No. 2 in the present proceedings. Both of them became the landlord of the demised premises in view of the family settlement arrived at between the members of the family. The landlord-petitioner filed ejectment petition of the tenant-respondent o