SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 1219

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
V.K.Bali and Satish Kumar Mittal JJ.
Chanchal Singh
Versus
State Of Punjab
Civil Writ Petition No. 8753 of 2001,
Decided On : NOVEMBER 14, 2002

Strict adherence to prescribed procedure for property disposal and the prohibition of giving public property as a bounty.

Headnote:

Punjab Panchayat Samities and Zila Parishad Act - Lease - Sec. 115(3), Sec. 137 - [Publicity for leasing out property, violation of lease rules, disposal of property, connivance of officials] - The court discussed the grounds for cancellation of lease deed, the relevant rules and instructions, and the disposal of property under the Act. The judgment highlighted the need for strict adherence to the prescribed procedure for property disposal and emphasized that public property cannot be given as a bounty.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought to quash orders for their eviction from leased plots obtained from Panchayat Samiti, citing forcible dispossession and show cause notices alleging connivance and lease rule violations.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the petition, emphasizing the grounds for cancellation of the lease, the need for strict adherence to property disposal procedures, and the insufficiency of evidence to challenge the impugned order.

Issues: Forcible dispossession, show cause notices, lease rule violations, disposal of property, connivance of officials

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for strict adherence to the prescribed procedure for property disposal and highlighted that public property cannot be given as a bounty.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

Judgment

V. K. BALI, J.

1. Chanchal Singh and 11 others through present petition filed by them under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari so as to quash order, Annexure P-11 and other similar orders issued to the petitioners and in consequence of setting aside of the orders aforesaid, to stay eviction of the petitioners from the plots that they had obtained on lease from Panchayat Samiti, Jandiala Guru. District Amritsar-second respondent herein.

2. Brief facts, as projected in the petition and relevant for deciding the controversy in issue, reveal that in February and May, 2000 the second respondent leased plots for ten years for business purposes after publicity for the plots, subject-matter of auction was done. The plots were of the size of two kanals. The petitioners being the highest bidders in the auction and having paid non-refundable security and advance lease money for one year, were handrd-over the possession by the Samiti after executing lease deeds. The petitioners commenced construction of boundary walls, stores, office etc. after filling up the low lying land at huge cost. Some of the petitioners even completed construction upto roof level. On 3/08/2000 the police of Jandiala Guru police station, at the behest of political rivals of the petitioners, came and demolished part of boundary wall of plot No. 3 of Smt. Soman Wati and threatened others to vacate the possession or face the dire consequences. It is the case of petitioners that this was done without issuance of any show cause notice for cancellation of the lease. Constrained, CWP No. 10271 of 2000 came to be filed in this Court challenging the forcible dispossession of petitioners at the hands of police on 7/08/2000. Despite knowledge of the orders passed by this Court, restraining the respondents not to dispossess them, respondents once again overtook demolition work of some of the properties of plot holders at odd hours. The Division Bench of this Court took notice of the aforesaid act and ordered restoration of demolished construction. However, ultimately writ petition was decided on 6/10/2000 and counsel for the State conceded that no action of eviction shall be taken without issuance of show cause notice to the petitioners. On 24/12/2000 show cause notices were issued to the petitioners which were received on 1/01/2001. These notices contained the allegation of connivance of petitioners with the Samiti authorities and violation of the Punjab Panchayat Samities and Zila Parishad (Sale, lease and other alienation of property and public places) Rules, 1964. Constrained, once over again, the petitioners filed CWP No. 208 of 2001 challenging the show cause notices. However, the said writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn enabling the petitioners to file reply to the show cause notices. The impugned order, Annexure P-11 and similar other then came to be passed by the Financial Commissioner and Secretary to Government of Punjab, Rural Development Department. It is this order and other similar orders, which, as mentioned above, have been challenged in the present petition.

3. Before we might proceed any further in the matter, we would like to mention the ultimate directions that came to be issued in the first writ petition bearing No. 10271 of 2000 which read as follows :-

"1. The respondent authority shall proceed to consider the matter regarding the auction alleged to have taken place in February and May, 2000 expeditiously. If possible, the matter shall be decided within three months. 2. Any party which is aggrieved by the final decision, shall be entitled to seek its remedy in accordance with law. 3. If the petitioners in CWP No. 10271 of 2000 have any grievance with regard to the violation of any interim order passed by the Court, they would be entitled to seek their remedy before the competent Court. 4. The petitioners in CWP No. 10271 of 2000 shall not raise any further construction for a period of


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top