SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 206

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI AND S. RANGANATHAN, JJ.
Deputy Commr, of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes), Ernakulam, Petitioner
Versus
M/s. Thomas Stephen and Co. Ltd., Quilon, Respondent.
Spl. Leave Petn. (Civil) Nos. 8747-49 of 1987,
D/- 14-3-1988.
Advocates Appeared
Mr. V. J. Francis, Advocate, for Petitioner.

Advocates:
V.J.Francis

Headnote:

Constitution of India Article 136 – Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 – Section 5A – Assessment - Appeal – Assessee is a manufacturer and dealer in tiles, terra-cotta wares and ceramics – It was assessed to tax under S. 5A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, for the assessment among other things on the purchase turnover of the cashew shells and consumed stores, lime shells etc., purchased by the assessee-Company – These are in abundant supply in that area – These are used, as it appears from the judgment of the High Court and from the facts found by the Tribunal, as fuel in the kiln in the factory of the assessee for the manufacture of tiles and others – It was sought to be assessed to tax – Assessee contended that cashew shells were used by them as fuel for (emphasis supplied) manufacturing products referred to above and, therefore –Held, Another contention raised before the High Court was that the goods had been disposed of otherwise than by way of sale within the State and, hence, liable to tax by virtue of S. 5A(1)(b) of the Act – question, therefore, is whether there is any disposal of these goods in any manner otherwise than by way of sale within the State. Disposal means transfer of title in the goods to any other person – Expression "dispose" means to transfer or alienate – It was formerly an essential word in any conveyance of land. See Jowitt the "Disctionay of English Law" and also Webster Comprehensive Dictionary (International Edn.) - Vol. 1, page 368. Clause (b) of the section requires that the goods in question should be transferred to some person otherwise than by way of sale. In this case, there was no evidence of any transfer at all, therefore, there was no disposal of the goods as known to law – Petition dismissed.

Judgment

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. - This is a petition for leave to appeal under Art. 136 of the Constitution of India from the judgment and Order of the High Court of Kerala, dated Dec. 9, 1986*. The High Court by the impugned judgment dismissed the revision cases, which were brought at the instance of the revenue.

* Reported in (1987) 1 Ker LT 161

2. The assessee is a manufacturer and dealer in tiles, terra-cotta wares and ceramics. It was assessed to tax under S. 5A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, hereinafter called the Act for the assessment years 1974-75, 1975-76 and 1976-77 among other things on the purchase turnover of the cashew shells and consumed stores, lime shells etc., purchased by the assessee-Company. These are in abundant supply in that area. These are used, as it appears from the judgment of the High Court and from the facts found by the Tribunal, as fuel in the kiln in the factory of the assessee for the manufacture of tiles and others. It was sought to be assessed to tax. The assessee contended that cashew shells were used by them as fuel for (emphasis supplied) manufacturing products referred to above and, therefore, by virtue of notification S.R.O. 732/73 the purchase turnover of cashew shells were exempt from tax. In the alternative, it was contended by the assessee that the purchases in question were not liable for levy of tax since none of the conditions prescribed in cl. (a), (b) or (c) of S. 5A of the Act were satisfied.

3. The assessee had also purchased during the relevant years in question, lime shell and certain stores described as consumed which had been used in the maintenance of the kiln and the factory. These purchases were also claimed as non-taxble in view of the conditions prescribed in Cl. (a), (b) or (c) of S. 5A of the Act, being not satisfied. The assessing authority and the First Appellate Authority overruled the contentions of the assessee and brought these purchases to tax under S. 5A(1) of the Act.

4. The relevant provisions of S. 5A( 1) of the Act and Cls. (a), (b) and (c) of the same are as follows :-

"5-A. Levy of purchase tax - (1) Every dealer who, in the course of his business, purchases from a registered dealer or from any other person any goods the sale or purchase of which is liable to tax under this Act in circumstances in which no tax is payable under S. 5, and either

(a) consumes such goods in the manufacture of other goods for sale or otherwise; or

(b) disposes of such goods in any manner other than by way of sale in the State; or

(c) despatches them to any place outside the State except as a direct result of sale or purchase in the course of inter-State trade or commerce,

Shall, whatever be the quantum of the turnover relating to such purchase for a year, pay tax on the taxable turnover relating to such purchase for the year at the rates mentioned in S. 5."

5. In second appeal the Tribunal also did not accept this case of the assessee regarding non-taxability of the purchase turnover of the cashew shells under the said notification. The Tribunal, however, held that the cashew shells, had been used only as fuel in the kiln for the manufacture of tiles and other goods and, hence, Cl. (a) of S. 5A(1) of the Act, was not satisfied, there being no consumption of the cashew shells in the manufacture of other goods or otherwise. The Tribunal was of the opinion that these were used for the manufacture. The Tribunal also held that there was no disposal of the lime shells or the consumed stores which were used up for the maintenance of the factory and kiln and that there was also no consumption of those goods in the manufacture of other goods for sale or otherwise. In this view of the matter the Tribunal held that these items were not taxable under S. 5A of the Act.

6. The revenue being aggrieved went to the High Court. The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and rejected the revenues contention.

7. The construction of S. 5A of the Act. came up for consideration before











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top