SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(P&H) 260

S.S.SODHI
Kaushalya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Lal – Respondent


Judgment

1. What falls for consideration in this appeal is the proviso to sub-sec. (1) of Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 .

2. Desh Kumar was killed in an accident with a bus. This happened at Samalkha on October 18, 1980. He died leaving behind his mother Smt. Kaushalya Devi, his brother Jai Bhagwan, his sister Prem Lata as also his widow Shashi Bala.

3. A claim for compensation was put in by the mother, brother and sister of the deceased. The widow was not, however impleaded as a party, despite a specific objection having been raised by the respondent to her non-joinder. The claimants instead sought to meet this objection by placing on record the affidavit of the widow - Shashi Bala. Exhibit P1 wherein it was stated that she had gone to her parents house and had given up her claim to compensation on account of the death of her deceased husband in favour of her mother-in-law, Smt. Kaushalya Devi.

4. The Tribunal held that the affidavit Exhibit P1 did not satisfy the requirements of law and accordingly dismissed the petition as being bad for non-joinder to the widow Shashi Bala as a party to this petition.

5. In dealing with this matter it would be pertinent to advert





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top