SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(P&H) 540

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.V.GUPTA
Walaiti Ram Mahabir Parshad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.

1. The the constitutional validity of Section 23-A recently inserted in the principal Act by the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (Amendment) Act 1981 (Punjab Act No. 7 of 1981) is the primary and indeed the core question in this set of fifteen cases which stand admitted to a hearing by the Division Bench.

2. The issues arising herein cannot be well appraised without reference to their somewhat tortuous legal background. Way back in 1961 the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act (hereinafter called the Act) was originally promulgated and Section 23 thereof authorised the Market Committees to levy ad valorem fee on agricultural produce bought sold by a licensee in the notified Market area at rate not exceeding Rupee 0.50.00 paise for every hundred pees. This scale of fee was retained till 1969 whereafter by Punjab Act No.25 1969 it was raised to Re. 1.00 per hundred and later by Punjab Act No. 17 of 1973 it was further escalated to Rupees.-s 1.50 per hundred and further by Punjab Act No. 13 of 1974 the fee was raised from Rs. 1.50 to Rs. 2.25 per hundred. This enhancement was challenged in this Court in M/s. Hanuman Dall and General Mills, Hissar V/s







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top