S.S.SANDHAWALIA, I.S.TIWANA, P.C.JAIN
Radhey Sham Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.
1. Whether unexplained inordinate delay in the finalisation of the proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act might well taint them with the vice of a colourable exercise of power and thus wholly vitiate the same - is the meaningful issue which comes to the fore in this reference to the Full Bench.
2. Though the matrix giving rise to the aforesaid issue is not in serious dispute yet it calls for a somewhat detailed notice. Way back on the 8th Sept., 1972, the respondent-State issued two notifications (Annexures-P.1 and P.2) under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter called the Act) for acquiring a huge compact area of 134 Acres 3 Kanals and 1 Marla situated in the two separate revenue estates of Ballabgarh and Ranhera for the specific purpose of the development of a Mandi Township astride the Delhi - Mathura, road. Comprised therein was an area of 8 Kanals within the revenue estate of Ballabhgarh originally owned by Shri Nawal Singh who had sold the same on the 11th Sept., 1961, to one Jaswant Rai for setting up an industry and he enclosed the same by a boundary wall. However in the month of Aug., 1980 the said Jaswant Rai sold the said are
Aflatoon V/s. Lt. Governor Of Delhi
Ambalal Purshottam V/s. Ahmedabad Municipal Corpn. Of The City Of Ahmedabad
Gujarat State Transport Corporation V/s. Valji Mulji Soneji
Smt. Gunwant Kaur V/s. Municipal Committee, Bhatinda
State Of Madhya Pradesh V/s. Vishnu Parsad Sharma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.