SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(P&H) 135

J.V.GUPTA
Tara Chand Chandani – Appellant
Versus
Shashi Bhushan Gupta – Respondent


JudgmentJudgment

1. The landlord petitioner has filed this revision against the order of Appellate Authority Ludhiana, dated November 26, 1977, whereby the order of the Rent Controller, dismissing his application for ejectment, has been maintained.

2. The premises in dispute is a portion of a residential building known as Lakshmi Vishnu Bhawan situated on Kailash Cinema Road, Civil Lines, Ludhiana. Vide rent note dated 26th July, 1962 (Exhibit A1) the premises in dispute, consisting of three rooms i.e. one office room on the first floor and two rooms on the second floor with bath, latrin, kitchen and store etc., was given on rent on a monthly rent of Rs. 138/-. The application for ejectment has been filed by the landlord-petitioner on the ground that he bona fide requires the premises for his own use and occupation. In the written statement filed on behalf of the tenant a plea was taken that the premises in dispute are not a residential building as it is being solely used for business and therefore the land lord is not entitled to get the premises vacated on the ground of his personal occupation. On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed :-

1. Whether the pet







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top