SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(P&H) 90

J.V.GUPTA
Ram Piari – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Fruit Company – Respondent


JudgmentJudgment

J.V.Gupta, J.

1. The landlord petitioner has filed this revision petition against the order of the Appellate Authority, Jullundir dated 23.1.1978, whereby the order of the Rent Controller directing ejectment of the tenant has been set aside.

2. Shrimati Ram Piari, widow of Shri Buta Ram petitioner filed application for ejectment alleging that the respondents Ram Saroop etc. had taken the shop on rent from her at Rs. 600/- per month with effect from March 25, 1972. It was alleged that the tenants had not paid the rent from March 25, 1972, that they had sub-let the premises without her consent and that they had changed the shape of the premises and had made other constructions without her permission, impairing the valuable utility of the premises. This application was contested by Ram Saroop tenant. It was stated by him that originally the premises were let out on rent by Surinder Kumar (who is son of the petitioner Shrimati Ram Piari) at Rs. 200/- per month on March 27, 1972 and from 1st of April, 1973, the rent was increased to Rs. 300/- per month. So the claim was that Surinder Kumar was the landlord and not the petitioner Shrimati Ram Piari. Other allegations were

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top