1. This application has been filed under S.152 of the Civil P.C. stating that in the decree-sheet dated May 3, 1968, prepared by the Additional District Judge, Patiala, in Cl. m words Killa No. 3 Min. and Rectangle No. 27 have not been incorporated through oversight. The applicant has, therefore, prayed that the decree-sheet be corrected accordingly so that it agrees with the judgement of the Court. The application has been opposed by the respondents on the ground that it is not within limitation.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in Cl. m in the heading of the decree-sheet after the words Mustateel No. 26, the words Killa No. 3 Min. and Mustateel No. 27 have not been mentioned through an oversight. He submits that under S.152 of the Civil P.C., this Court has inherent powers to rectify clerical mistakes at any time. He requests that the mistake be ordered to be rectified. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents, has vehemently argued that Art.137 of the Limitation Act which prescribes a period of three years, is applicable to the present case. He further submits that as the application for amendment has been filed after t