SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(P&H) 131

D.K.MAHAJAN, H.R.SODHI
Jagatjit Distilling And Allied Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment

1. This order will dispose of six references (Sales Tax References Nos. 8, 9 and 10 of 1969 and 1, 2 and 2-A of 1970). Out of these references, five are under Section 22 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (East Punjab Act 46 of 1948) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the sixth reference is under Section 9(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Central Act) read with Section 22(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act.

2. Certain questions of law were not referred by the Tribunal under Section 22(1) of the Act. Consequently, an application was made to this Court under Section 22(2) and a question of law set out below was agreed to be framed in place of question No. (2). This question was deemed to have been substituted in all the references :-

-

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of these cases is the price of bottles liable to sales tax when bottled liquor is sold ?

3. The assessee is the Jagatjit Distilling and Allied Industries Limited, Hamira. The assessee is engaged in distilling liquor. For purposes of sale, the liquor is either sold in bottles or in barrels. In the present case, we are concerned with the sale of li

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top