SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(P&H) 159

R.S.NARULA, C.G.SURI
Punjab Waqf Board Ambala – Appellant
Versus
Panchayat Deh – Respondent


Judgment


1. Nine Appeals under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent being L. P. A. Nos.336, 356 to 362 and 364 of 1969 have been filed against the judgment dated 28-1-1969 of our learned brother, Tuli, J. My Lord had accepted 9 connected second appeals to set aside the judgments and decrees granted in favour of the plaintiff-appellant, Punjab Waqf Board, by the Court of first appeal, who had in turn set aside the judgments and decrees of the trial Court dismissing 9 suits for possession of land filed by the plaintiff-appellant. The proceedings in all these connected cases had been consolidated in these three Courts as the questions of law and fact involved were almost the same. We find it possible for the same reasons, to dispose of these 9 appeals by one judgment.

2. A piece of land which is a part of the current Khasra No.247, corresponding to Khasra No.198 of the earlier settlement, is shown in the Revenue records of village Garhi Brahmanan, Tehsil Sonepat, District Rohtak, as uncultivable or barren grave yard (Ghairmumkin Kabarstan ). The area of this graveyard was given as 3 Bighas 4 Biswas in these records from 1909-10 to 1945-46 vide copies of Jamabandis, Exhibits P.19 and D.1, bu














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top