R.S.NARULA, C.G.SURI
Punjab Waqf Board Ambala – Appellant
Versus
Panchayat Deh – Respondent
1. Nine Appeals under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent being L. P. A. Nos.336, 356 to 362 and 364 of 1969 have been filed against the judgment dated 28-1-1969 of our learned brother, Tuli, J. My Lord had accepted 9 connected second appeals to set aside the judgments and decrees granted in favour of the plaintiff-appellant, Punjab Waqf Board, by the Court of first appeal, who had in turn set aside the judgments and decrees of the trial Court dismissing 9 suits for possession of land filed by the plaintiff-appellant. The proceedings in all these connected cases had been consolidated in these three Courts as the questions of law and fact involved were almost the same. We find it possible for the same reasons, to dispose of these 9 appeals by one judgment.
2. A piece of land which is a part of the current Khasra No.247, corresponding to Khasra No.198 of the earlier settlement, is shown in the Revenue records of village Garhi Brahmanan, Tehsil Sonepat, District Rohtak, as uncultivable or barren grave yard (Ghairmumkin Kabarstan ). The area of this graveyard was given as 3 Bighas 4 Biswas in these records from 1909-10 to 1945-46 vide copies of Jamabandis, Exhibits P.19 and D.1, bu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.