SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(P&H) 128

R.S.NARULA, C.G.SURI
B S Nat – Appellant
Versus
Bachan Singh – Respondent


Judgment


1. A plaint in a suit filed by the appellant for the recovery of Rs.2000/- as pensation for the loss of or damage to his car in a motor accident has been returned by the Sub Judge at Chandigarh under O.7, R.10. Civil P. C. for presentation to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (hereinafter briefly referred to as the tribunal) on the finding that the Civil Courts had no jurisdiction to entertain the claim. The plaintiff has come up in appeal.

2. On 3-10-1961 at about 8.45 a. m. the appellants car No. PNP-670 collided with truck No. PNE-7759 on the road dividing sectors 18 and 19 in Chandigarh Capital. The truck belonged to defendant-respondent No.2 and was being driven at the time of the accident by defendant-respondent No.1. It was insured with M/s. Oriental Fire Insurance Co. , defendant-respondent No.3. The appellant not only sustained personal injuries in the accident but his car was also damaged. The appellant filed a separate claim in respect of his personal injuries before the Tribunal and it has been stated at the bar that the claim has since been allowed. In respect of the damage to his vehicle, the appellant filed a separate claim in the Civil Court under the impr

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top