SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(P&H) 111

H.R.SODHI
Tipper Chand Dhanpat – Appellant
Versus
Matu Ram – Respondent


Judgment

H. R. Sodhi, J.

1. This is a regular second appeal by Tipper Chand defendant against the judgment and decree of the Senior Subordinate Judge, with enhanced appellate powers. Karnal, who dismissed his appeal on 5th December, 1958, on the ground that it was insufficiently stamped and that the mistake on the part of the appellant was not bona fide. The facts as are necessary for the proper disposal of the point of law can be stated In a narrow compass.

2. Matu Ram plaintiff respondent filed a suit against the appellant and his brother ayudhiya Parshad respondent praying for permanent injunction restraining the appellant from interfering with his ownership and possession of the southern one-half portion of the roof of the Inner Dahliz as shown in the plan filed with the plaint, also from using that portion of the roof as passage, and further restraining him from opening any door in the same. The trial Court decreed the suit and granted a permanent Injunction restraining the defendant appellant from in any way interfering with the ownership and possession of the plaintiff in regard to the southern one-half portion of the roof of the inner Dahliz by constructing any door or an op









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top