SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(P&H) 181

S.B.CAPOOR, R.S.NARULA
State Of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Roshan Lal Sharma – Respondent


Judgment


1. This Letters Patent appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated the 22nd July, 1968, whereby the Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Roshan Lal Sharma Teshildar (under suspension) now respondent, was partly allowed by the learned Single Judge. The appellants are (1) State of Haryana (2) Financial Commissioner, State of Haryana, Chandigarh and (3) Commissioner. Ambala Division, Ambala, who were respondents to the writ petition.

2. The respondent was serving as Tehsildar, and after the creation of the State of Haryana, his services were allotted to that State. Before the reorganization of the Punjab there were certain allegations of mis-conduct against the respondent and Mr. A. L. Fletcher who was then Financial Commissioner, Revenue framed a charge sheet containing a number of charges against him which was served on him together with a summary of allegations by the Commissioner, Ambala Division vide Memorandum No.519/st/kf/ea-II-25152, dated the 13th September, 1966. He was told that it was proposed to take action against him under Rule 14 of the Punjab Tahsildari Rules, 1932, hereinafter to be refer

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top