SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(P&H) 145

R.S.NARULA, S.S.SANDHAWALIA
Inder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Labour Court, Jullundur – Respondent


Judgment


1. The main question which calls for decision in this petition of Inder Singh and 43 other employees of Messrs. Podar Textile Mills, Amritsar (respondent No. 2), under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is whether a disputed claim in pursuance of a notification under the Minimum Wages Act (11 of 1948) (hereinafter referred to as the Wages Act,) can or cannot be made under sub-section (2) of Section 33C of the Industrial Disputes Act, (14 of 1947) (hereafter called the Act), before a Labour Court established under the Act.

2. Respondent No. 2 is an industrial concern engaged in finishing textile goods. Minimum Wages of certain categories of the employees in such concerns had originally been fixed by a notification, dated August 4, 1964. That notification was subsequently superseded by notification, dated March 4, 1965, issued under Section 5 92) of the Wages Act, Disputes arose between the petitioners and respondent No.2 regarding the wages due to the petitioners for the period March 4, 1965, to June 30, 1965. The petitioners moved applications under S. 33-C (2) of the Act before Labour Court, Jullundur (respondent No. 1) for the computation of the wages to which they
















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top