R.S.NARULA, S.S.SANDHAWALIA
Inder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Labour Court, Jullundur – Respondent
1. The main question which calls for decision in this petition of Inder Singh and 43 other employees of Messrs. Podar Textile Mills, Amritsar (respondent No. 2), under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is whether a disputed claim in pursuance of a notification under the Minimum Wages Act (11 of 1948) (hereinafter referred to as the Wages Act,) can or cannot be made under sub-section (2) of Section 33C of the Industrial Disputes Act, (14 of 1947) (hereafter called the Act), before a Labour Court established under the Act.
2. Respondent No. 2 is an industrial concern engaged in finishing textile goods. Minimum Wages of certain categories of the employees in such concerns had originally been fixed by a notification, dated August 4, 1964. That notification was subsequently superseded by notification, dated March 4, 1965, issued under Section 5 92) of the Wages Act, Disputes arose between the petitioners and respondent No.2 regarding the wages due to the petitioners for the period March 4, 1965, to June 30, 1965. The petitioners moved applications under S. 33-C (2) of the Act before Labour Court, Jullundur (respondent No. 1) for the computation of the wages to which they
Ambica Mills Co. Ltd. V/s. S.B. Bhatt
Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. V/s. Gopal Bhiva
Central Bank Of India Ltd. V/s. P.S. Rajagopalan
Lakshmi Mills Co. Ltd. V/s. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore
Savatram Ramprasad Mills Co. Ltd. Akola V/s. Baliram Ukandaji
Lenox Photo Mount Manufacturing Co. Madurai V/s. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Madurai
South Indian Bank Ltd. V/s. Chacko
Town Municipal Council, Athani V/s. Presiding Officer Labour Court Hubli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.