PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Tek Chand, J.
Mohinder Singh
Versus
Balbir Kaur
Second Appeal No. 134 of 1968,
Decided On : APRIL 5, 1968
PUNJAB PRE-EMPTION ACT, 1913 - SECTION 15 - RIGHT OF PRE-EMPTION - SALE BY FEMALE OF LAND TO WHICH SHE HAS SUCCEEDED THROUGH HER FATHER - INTERPRETATION OF THE TERM "SUCCEEDED THROUGH" - MEANING OF "THROUGH" - WHETHER THE DAUGHTERS OF THE VENDOR HAD SUCCEEDED TO THE LAND THROUGH THEIR FATHER UNDER A WILL - HELD, NO.
Fact of the Case:
Gurmit Kaur, one of the five daughters of Bagga Singh, sold her share of the land to the defendants-vendees. Balbir Kaur, sister of Gurmit Kaur, instituted a suit for possession by pre-emption on the ground that she was a co-sharer and as such could preempt the sale under Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act. The defendants-vendees resisted the suit on several grounds, including the contention that the plaintiff did not have a right of pre-emption under Section 15 of the Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the plaintiff did not have a right of pre-emption under Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act. The court found that the vendor, Gurmit Kaur, had succeeded to the land through her father under a will, and therefore, the provisions of Section 15(2) of the Act applied. The court interpreted the term "succeeded through" to mean "from" and held that the daughters of the vendor had succeeded to the land from their father under the will, and not through him.
Issues: Whether the plaintiff had a right of pre-emption under Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the term "succeeded through" in Section 15(2) of the Punjab Pre-emption Act to mean "from". The court held that the daughters of the vendor had succeeded to the land from their father under the will, and not through him. Therefore, the provisions of Section 15(2) of the Act applied, and the plaintiff did not have a right of pre-emption.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit.
Tek Chand, J.
1. This is a regular second appeal preferred by the defendant vendees against the plaintiffs-pre-emptor from the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Sangrur, affirming that of the trial Court decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs-preemptor.
2. The facts of this case are that one Bagga Singh executed a will on 18th of August, 1948 (Exhibit P/l) in favour of his five daughters stating that his five daughters would become in equal share, owners in possession enjoying the same rights as the testator. He died in 1949. Gurmit Kaur, one of his five daughters, sold her share of the land for Rs. 29,000 to defendants 1 to 8 on 8th of December, 1964. Balbir Kaur, sister of Gurmit Kaur, vendor, instituted a suit for possession by pre-emption on the ground that she was a co-sharer and as such could preempt the sale under Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act. The defendants-vendees resisted the suit on several grounds which gave rise to the following issues:-
-
(1) Whether the plaintiff got a right of pre-emptor with regard to the sale in dispute.
(2) Whether the sale price was actually paid or fixed in good faith?
(3) If issue No. 2 is not proved, what is the market value of the land in suit?
(4) To what extent, the defendants-vendees are entitled to claim as deed and registration expenses?
(5) Whether the part of land in suit was Banjar Qadim at the time of the sale and the same has been reclaimed by the vendees-defendants and if so, to what effect?
(6) Relief.
Arguments have been addressed on the first issue only and there is no longer any dispute on issues 2 to 5. The trial Court decreed the plaintiffs suit directing the plaintiff to pay or deposit into Court the sum of Rs. 30858/50 P. after deducting the part of the sale price already paid into Court on or before 2nd November, 1967, failing which the suit of the plaintiff would stand dismissed with costs. The vendees who filed the appeal against the judgment and decree of the trial Court were unsuccessful before the District Judge, Sangrur.
3. They have now come up in second appeal to this Court and the only point which calls for a decision is whether the plaintiff had a right of pre-emption under Section 15 of the Punjab Preemption Act. The relevant provisions are reproduced below:-
-
"15(1) The right of pre-emption in respect of agricultural land and village immoveable property shall vest -- (a) xxxx
(b) where the sale is of a share out of joint land or property and is not made by all the co-sharers jointly, FIRST in the sons or daughters or sons sons or daughters sons of the vendor or vendors;
SECONDLY, in the brothers or brothers sons of the vendor or vendors;
THIRDLY, in the fathers brothers or fathers brothers sons of the vendor or vendors;
FOURTHLY, in the other co-sharers;
FIFTHLY, in the tenants who hold under tenancy of the vendor or vendors the land or property sold or a part thereof;
(c) xxxx
(2) Notwithstanding a anything contained in Sub-section (1) -- (a) where the sale is by a female of land or property to which she has succeeded through her father or brother or the sale in respect of such land or property is by the son or daughter of such female after inheritance, the right of preemption shall vest, -- (i) if the sale is by such female, in her brother or brothers son;
(ii) if the sale is by the son or daughter of such female, in the mothers brothers or the mothers brothers sons of the vendor or vendors;
(b) where the sale is by a female of land or property to which she has succeeded through her husband, or through her son in case the son has inherited the land or property sold from his father, the right of pre-emption shall vest, -- FIRST, in the son or daughter of such husband of the female;
SECONDLY, in the husbands brother or husbands brothers son of such female."
The plaintiff has asserted her pre-emptive right as a co-sharer along with her other sisters and has contended that the right of pre-emption vests in her u/s. 15(1)(
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.