R.S.NARULA
Raghunath Rai – Appellant
Versus
P. Sahai – Respondent
1. The circumstances which have given rise to the filing of this petition for contempt proceedings against the respondent, may first be surveyed.
2. Raghunath Rai petitioner was removed from Government service on 22.11.1953. He filed a suit for a declaration to the effect that the order of his removal from service was void and he was entitled to all the emoluments etc. on that basis. The suit was decreed by the trial Court on 5.06.1964. While dismissing the first appeal of the Union of India against the decree of the trial Court, the learned Senior Subordinate Judge, Amritsar held on 10.09.1964, that the order of petitioners removal from service was illegal and ultra vires Art. 311 of the Constitution and the petitioner was, therefore, deemed to be in the service of the Railway Administration and was entitled to all the benefits and emoluments attached to his post.
3. Against the aforesaid decree of the first appellate Court, the Union of India filed Regular Second Appeal No. 4 of 1965 on 21.12.1964. In an application of the petitioner (C. M. No. 1647 C of 1965) for fixing the Regular Second appeal for hearing on some early actual date, I passed the following order on 27.09
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.