SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(P&H) 23

R.S.NARULA
Raghunath Rai – Appellant
Versus
P. Sahai – Respondent


Judgment

1. The circumstances which have given rise to the filing of this petition for contempt proceedings against the respondent, may first be surveyed.

2. Raghunath Rai petitioner was removed from Government service on 22.11.1953. He filed a suit for a declaration to the effect that the order of his removal from service was void and he was entitled to all the emoluments etc. on that basis. The suit was decreed by the trial Court on 5.06.1964. While dismissing the first appeal of the Union of India against the decree of the trial Court, the learned Senior Subordinate Judge, Amritsar held on 10.09.1964, that the order of petitioners removal from service was illegal and ultra vires Art. 311 of the Constitution and the petitioner was, therefore, deemed to be in the service of the Railway Administration and was entitled to all the benefits and emoluments attached to his post.

3. Against the aforesaid decree of the first appellate Court, the Union of India filed Regular Second Appeal No. 4 of 1965 on 21.12.1964. In an application of the petitioner (C. M. No. 1647 C of 1965) for fixing the Regular Second appeal for hearing on some early actual date, I passed the following order on 27.09




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top