R.S.NARULA
Goodlass Nerolac Paints Private Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Chief Commissioner – Respondent
R. S. Narula, J.
1. The management of Goodlass Nerolao Paints (Private), Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the employer), has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to quash the order of reference dated 3/9 August 1963, made by the Chief Commissioner, Delhi (respondent 1), under Sec.10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act), and to set aside by a writ in the nature of certiorari or by other appropriate direction the award of the industrial tribunal, Delhi (respondent 2), dated 30 August 1965, published in Delhi Gazette, dated 14 October 1965, directing reinstatement of Bansi Lal, respondent 3.
2. The facts giving rise to the filing of the petition are these. Bansi Lal, respondent 3 (hereinafter called the contesting respondent), was employed as a salesman by the employer in April 1953. He was confirmed as such on 20 July 1953. It is claimed by the employer that in his capacity as a salesman the contesting respondent was not a workman within the meaning of that expression in the Act. According to the employer the services of the contesting respondent as a salesman were brought to an end with his consent in July 1961, and t
Bareilly Electricity Supply Company, Ltd. V/s. Sirajuddin And Anr.
Express Newspapers, Ltd. V/s. Labour Court, Madurai, And Anr.
Assam Oil Company, Ltd. V/s. Its Workmen
Chartered Bank V/s. Chartered Bank Employees Union And Anr.
Amritsar Rayan And Silk Mills (Private), Ltd. V/s. Industrial Tribunal, Punjab, And Ors.
British India Corporation, Ltd. V/s. Industrial Tribunal, Punjab, And Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.