SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(P&H) 198

D.FALSHAW, TEK CHAND
British India Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal, Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Falshaw, J.

1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution which has been referred to a Division Bench because of certain difficulties arising out of the interpretation of section 33 of the industrial Disputes Act 1947. The section as a whole deals with the maintenance of the status quo during the pendency of conciliation proceedings or cases proceeding before Labour Courts and Tribunals and sub-section (1) deals with the status quo as regards the matters connected with the pending dispute itself. Sub-section (2) reads:

"During the pendency of any such proceedings in respect of an industrial dispute, the employer may, in accordance with the standing orders applicable to a workman concerned in such dispute- (a) alter, in regard to any matter not connected with the dispute, the conditions of service applicable to that workman immediately before the commencement of such proceedings; or

(b) for any misconduct not connected with the dispute, discharge or punish, whether by dismissal or otherwise that workman:

Provided that no such workman shall be discharged or dismissed, unless he has been paid wages for one month and an application has been made by the employer to


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top