SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(P&H) 13

R.S.NARULA
Associated Hotels Of India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Excise And Taxation Officer – Respondent


Judgment

R.S.Narula, J.

1. The main question of law which calls for decision in this case is whether the approximate cost of food included in the consolidated charge made by a hotelier from a resident client during his stay in the hotel is liable to tax under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 46 of 1948 or not. I will refer to the said Act in this judgment as the Punjab Act. In other words the question is whether hoteliers who make one consolidated charge from their clients for providing them with residential accommodation, services, linen, food, etc. and who do not allow any rebate if food is not taken or served transfer the food to their customers for consideration so as to attract the provisions of S. 2 (h) of the Punjab Act or not.

2. Messrs Associated Hotels of India Ltd., petitioners in this case are such hoteliers. They have been duly registered since March 30, 1949 as dealers under the Punjab Act. The business carried on by the petitioners consists of two branches. The first is the hoteliers business proper. The second is their restaurant business. As hoteliers, the petitioners are receiving guests in their hotel where they provide them with comfortable lodging and various o























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top