SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(P&H) 65

P.C.PANDIT
Amar Singh And Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Ram Rakha – Respondent


Judgment

1. This revision petition has been filed by a tenant whose ejectment has been ordered both by the Appellate Authority as well as the Rent Controller.

2. The main ground of ejectment, with which we are concerned in this petition, is that the shop in dispute, which has been given on rent, was closed for the last 17 months and, consequently, the tenant was liable to ejectment under Section 13(2)(v) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, hereinafter called the Act, which says:

(2) "A landlord who seeks to evict his tenant shall apply to the Controller for a direction in that behalf. If the Controller, after giving the tenant a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the application is satisfied-- x x x x x x(v) that where the building is situated in a place other than a hill station, the tenant has ceased to occupy the building for a continuous period of four months without reasonable cause, the Controller may make an order directing the tenant to put the landlord in possession of the building or rented land and if the Controller is not so satisfied he shall make an order rejecting the application: x x x".

3. The tenants position was that he was a carpenter and










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top