SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(P&H) 76

D.K.MAHAJAN, S.S.SANDHAWALIA
Pahar Chand And Sons – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

D.K.Mahajan, J.

1. At the instance of the assessee this court directed the Sales Tax Tribunal under Section 22(3) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act to state the following question of law for the opinion of this court:

Whether, in the circumstances of the case and on the evidence, the finding that the disputed sales were not deductible from the petitioners taxable turnover, is legally unjustified ?

2. When the reference was made we directed the Tribunal by our order dated 12th January, 1970, passed under Section 23(4) of the Act to make a proper statement of the case. This has been done.

3. The assessment year in question is 1952-53. The assessee is the firm Messrs. Pahar Chand and Sons, a registered dealer under the Act. The firm is dealing in vegetable ghee and cloth. It submitted all the four quarterly returns for the assessment year in question and disclosed its gross turnover at Rs. 4,65,865-3-0. It claimed deductions in respect of sales made to registered dealers amounting to Rs. 3,72,903-11-6 under Section 5(2)(a)(ii) and Rs. 22,464-4-0 under Section 5(2)(a)(v) of the Act. An amount of Rs. 2,203 was voluntarily deposited as sales tax. The assessing authority issued












































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top