PRITAM SINGH PATTAR, D.K.MAHAJAN
Additional Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Roshan Lal Kuthiala (Deceased) (By His Legal Representatives) – Respondent
Pritam Singh Pattar and D.K.Mahajan JJ.
1. This order will dispose of Income-tax Cases Nos. 15 and 16 of 1972.
2. The Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Delhi (hereinafter called " the petitioner "), has made this application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to direct the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, to refer the following question of law for the opinion of this court:
" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in condoning the delay and in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ? "
3. Both these cases relate to the same assessee, Roshan Lal Kuthiala. The assessee died during the pendency of these cases and by order dated March 12, 1973, his sons, Rajinder Lal Kuthiala and Ravinder Lal Kuthiala, and widow, Smt. Lila Devi, were brought on the record as legal representatives in both these cases. The Income-tax Case No. 15 of 1972 relates to the assessment year 1959-60 and the Income-tax Case No. 16 of 1972 relates to the assessment year 1960-61.
4. The facts of Income-tax Case No. 15 of 1972 are that for the
Commissioner Of Income-tax V/s. Rajasthan Mines Ltd.
G. Venkataswami Naidu And Co. V/s. Commissioner Of Income-tax
Oriental Investment Co. P. Ltd. V/s. Commissioner Of Income-tax
Manindra Land And Building Corporation Ltd. V/s. Bhutnath Banerjee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.