SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(P&H) 75

PRITAM SINGH PATTAR, D.K.MAHAJAN
Additional Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Roshan Lal Kuthiala (Deceased) (By His Legal Representatives) – Respondent


Judgment

Pritam Singh Pattar and D.K.Mahajan JJ.

1. This order will dispose of Income-tax Cases Nos. 15 and 16 of 1972.

2. The Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Delhi (hereinafter called " the petitioner "), has made this application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to direct the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, to refer the following question of law for the opinion of this court:

" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in condoning the delay and in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ? "

3. Both these cases relate to the same assessee, Roshan Lal Kuthiala. The assessee died during the pendency of these cases and by order dated March 12, 1973, his sons, Rajinder Lal Kuthiala and Ravinder Lal Kuthiala, and widow, Smt. Lila Devi, were brought on the record as legal representatives in both these cases. The Income-tax Case No. 15 of 1972 relates to the assessment year 1959-60 and the Income-tax Case No. 16 of 1972 relates to the assessment year 1960-61.

4. The facts of Income-tax Case No. 15 of 1972 are that for the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top