SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(P&H) 158

PRITAM SINGH PATTAR, D.K.MAHAJAN
Additional Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Karnail Singh V. Kaleran – Respondent


Judgment

1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Chandigarh Bench) has referred the following question of law for our opinion :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that no penalty was leviable in this case under Section 271(1)(c) read with the Explanation thereto and in deleting the penalty of Rs. 50,000 levied by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner ?"

2. In the assessment year 1966-67, the Income-tax Officer received information that the assessee had been found in possession of cash amounting to Rs. 1,72,679 by the police at Ambala Cantt. bus stand on March 1, 1966. A notice was issued to him under Section 139(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called "the Act"). The assessee filed his return on August 6, 1966, declaring an income of Rs. 163 from interest. Notices were issued to the assessee under Sections 142(1), 143(2) and 131 of the Act He was examined at considerable length and thereafter the Income-tax Officer assessed him on an income of Rs. 1,77,842. The break up of this income is as follows :

(a) Income from interest as declared--Rs. 163.

(b) Amount recovered by the police in possession of the assess






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top