SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(P&H) 84

D.S.TEWATIA
Sood And Company, Kulu – Appellant
Versus
Surjit Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

D.S.Tewatia, J.

1. Gurpal Singh deceased was runover on a public road at 4.45 p.m. on 11.3.1967 by a petrol tanker No. PNN-830 driven by Lachhman Singh and he died instantaneously on the spot.

2. The wife of the deceased on her own behalf, as also on behalf of her two minor sons and one daughter from the loins of the deceased, through Claim Petition No. 88/Addl. of 1968, claimed Rs. 75,000/- from Sood and Company (respondent No. 1) the owners of the tanker; Lachhman Singh (respondent No. 2), driver of the offending vehicle; and Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. (respondent No. 3) with which the said tanker was insured, on account of the death of the deceased caused by Lachhman Singh driver by his rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle.

3. The parents of Gurpal Singh deceased through a separate claim petition (Claim Petition No. 19/Addl. of 1968) claimed Rs. 30,0.0/- from the above said respondents on the basis of the same cause of action.

4. The deceased was claimed to be 35 years old and drawing a salary of Rs. 264/- p. m. as mechanic in the Railways.

5. Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 resisted the claims, inter-alia, on the ground that the accident in which






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top