SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 1160

ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Commissioner Of C. Ex. , Chandigarh – Appellant
Versus
Stelko Strips Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment

Ashutosh Mohunta, J.

1 The Tribunal has referred the following question of law for adjudication by this Court :-

#28;Whether private challans other than the prescribed documents are valid for taking modvat credit under the Central Excise Rules, 1944?#29;

2 Mr. Gurpreet Singh, counsel for the Revenue has submitted that as per Rule 57G of Central Excise Rules, 1944 (for short #24;the Rules#25;), documents have been specified on the basis of which Modvat credit can be availed of and as private challans are not one of the documents which have been specified under Rule 57G of the Rules, therefore, Modvat credit is not allowable to the respondent on the basis of private challans.

3 This Court in Commissioner of Central Excise, Panchkula. v. M/s. Auto Spark Industries, Panchkula, CEC No. 34 of 2004, decided on 11-7-2006, while relying on the issues in Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad -I v. Gujarat Medicraft Pvt. Ltd . and the Department#25;s Circular dated 19-11-2001, has held that once duty payment is not disputed and it is found that documents are genuine and not fraudulent, then the manufacturer would be entitled to Modvat credit on duty paid inputs.

4 Similar view was


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top