SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 2061

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Amnider Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

1. This Court is flooded with the petitions filed by run away couples in which the girls, who have just attained the majority, are filing petitions seeking protection for life and liberty allegedly threatened by their parents, who could be seen wailing helplessly and haplessly chasing their daughters in the corridors of this Court, who out of infatuation, are marrying young boys who could hardly provide them any future.

2. This is yet another case of a run away couple, who has filed the present petition under Sec.482 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (for short cr. P. C. ) seeking direction to respondents Nos.1 to 3 to protect their life and liberty which is alleged to have been threatened by the parents of petitioner No.1 much less respondent No.4 as they have got married against his wishes.

3. According to the averments made in the petition, petitioner No.1 is a Brahmin whereas petitioner No.2 is a Jatt Sikh. Although ho documentary evidence has been placed on record to prove the date of birth yet it is averred in para 5 of the petition that petitioner No. l was born on 20.8.1991 and petitioner No.2 was bom on 22.2.1988. It is further averred that they have got marr











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top