Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.

1. This order will dispose of a bunch of 47 petitions being CWP No. 16978 of 1995, CWP Nos. 884, 2560, 4261, 4779, 4780, 5444, 5448, 5449, 5469, 5506, 5539 to 5541, 5572, 5677, 6177, 6259, 6472, 6543, 6891, 6892, 7523, 7618, 7638, 8152, 8328, 8379, 9363, 10860, 10861, 10888, 10940, 10979, 10998, 11191, 12143, 12895, 12896, 12897, 13169, 13751, 14015, 15382, 15412, 16628 of 1996 and CWP No. 15412 of 1997, which has been placed before this Bench in pursuance of the order of learned Single Judge dated 11.2.2009 to the following effect :-

"These matters have been received back from Honble the Supreme Court by way of remand. In the remand order, Honble the Supreme Court held as follows :- "The two judgments, namely, the judgment passed in Neelams case (supra) and the judgment impugned in the present appeals are contradictory on the question of interpretation of para 6(d) though one of the Honble Judges figures in both the judgments. Normally, we would have resolved the conflict, but one Honble Judge being common both the judgments, we intend to leave the matter to the High Court itself to reconsider the whole position, particularly as some other infirmities