M.FATHIMA BEEVI, N.M.KASLIWAL
Mohinder Sain Garg: Davinder Pritpal Singh: Balwinder Singh: Chiranji Lal Sharma: Charanjit Singh: Rajesh Kumar Saili – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
Judgment
N.M.KASLIWAL, J.
(1) SPECIAL leave granted.
(2) THE above two writ petitions and four civil appeals are disposed of by one single order as identical questions of law are involved in these cases. In order to appreciate the controversy in these cases we shall refer to the paper book of Civilarising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 14292 of 1989. All the appellants as well as the two petitioners in the writ petitions would be referred herein as the petitioners.
(3) AN advertisement was published in the Tribune (English) on 3/08/1988 by the office of the Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab Chairman Selection Committee, Patiala for appointment to 47 posts of Excise and Taxation Inspectors. In the advertisement it was provided that there will be three written papers of English, Punjabi and General Knowledge of B.A. standard. Those who get 33 per cent marks in each paper and 40 per cent marks in aggregate will be called for interview. Total marks for the written test were kept at 300 and for interview 100. Written examination was held in January 1989 in which all the petitioners appeared and were also called for interview but they did not qualify
applied : Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana
considered : Minor A. Peeriakaruppan v. State of T.N.
Nisha Maghu v. State of J. and K.
Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
R. Chitralekha v. State of Mysore
Lila Dhar v. State of Rajasthan
Koshal Kumar Gupta v. State of J. and K.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.