SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 2491

J.S.NARANG
Jai Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Bal Mukand – Respondent


Judgment

J.S.NARANG, J.

1. This judgment would dispose of two FAOs bearing No.12 and 499 of 2005, as the same is the result of one and the same election of councilor of Municipal Council and as such involve the common question of law and facts. The facts are being taken from FAO No.12 of 2005. The order dated December 14, 2004, passed by the Election tribunal upon the election petition presented under Sec.76 read with sections 89 and 90 of the Punjab State Election Commission Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") read with rules 87,88 and 89 of the punjab Municipal Election Rules 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "the rules"),has been made the subject matter of challenge.

2. The elections to the Municipal Council, Mandi Gobindgarh were held on March 9, 2003. The candidates filed their nominations for contesting the elections. As per respondent No.1, the contest was between the appellant himself i. e. Jai Parkash son of Surjit Singh and Balmukand son of Shri Muni Lal. Balmukand contested as a candidate of Bhartiya Janta party and Jai Parkash contested as nominee candidate of Congress party. Both had contested from ward No.18 of Municipal Council, Gobindgarh. Jai parkash had been






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top