A.C.GUPTA, D.A.DESAI
S. Raghbir Singh Gill – Appellant
Versus
S. Gurcharan Singh Tohra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
DESAI, J.:— Purity of election and secrecy of ballot, two central pillars supporting the edifice of Parliamentary democracy envisioned in the constitution stand in confrontation with each other or are complimentary to each other, present the core problem in this appeal.
2. First to the factual metrix. Punjab Legislative Assembly formed a constituency for electing members to the Council of States. On March 3, 1976, a notification was issued calling upon the members of Punjab Legislative Assembly to elect three members to the Council of States. The election programme was : March10, 1976, was prescribed as the last date for filing nominations; the scrutiny of the nominations was to be made on March 11, 1976; March 13, 1976, was the last date by which it was permissible to withdraw from the election; in the event of contest, poll was to take place on March 27, 1976; counting was to be done on the same day. Respondent 4 Smt. Amarjit Kaur and respondent 5 Satpal Mittal were nominated as candidates of the political party described as Indian National Congress. Appellant Sardar Raghbir Singh Gill claimed to be an independent candidate. Respondent 1 Gurcharan Singh Tohra was a nomine
relied on : Kesavanada Bharati v. State of Kerala
Mahinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner
referred to : N. P. Pannuswami V. Returning Officer
relied on : Basheshar Nath v. C. I. T.
Behram Khurshed pesikaka v.State of Bombay
relied on : Jitendra Bahadur Singh v. Krishna Behari
Sumitra Devi v. Sheo Shanker Prasad Yadav
Ram Autar Singh Bhadauria v. Ram Gopal Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.