V.M.JAIN, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of Civil Revision 2534 of 1999 and Civil Revision 5618 of 1999 between the same parties and concerning same property.

2. Civil Revision 2534 of 1999 is against the judgment dated 10-4-1999 passed by the District Judge (in appeal) setting aside the order dated 24-1-1998 passed by the trial Court dismissing the ad interim injunction application of the plaintiff, while the other Civil Revision 5618 of 1999 is against the order dated 13-10-1999 passed by the Additional District Judge holding that the Award given by the Arbitrator was executable and ordering the issuance of warrants of possession qua the licensed portion of the property in question and also issuing warrants of attachment for the recovery of the awarded amount.

3. The facts of Civil Revision 2534 of 1999, in brief, are that M/s. S.S.Fasteners (plaintiff) filed a suit against Sat Paul Verma (defendant) for permanent injunction restraining him from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the tenanted premises and from dispossessing it therefrom except in due course of law. In the said suit, it was alleged that it had taken the entire disputed premises