M.S. LIBERHAN, J.

1. The petitioner, through this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India made three fold prayer :-

(i) Not to auot work to respondent Judges, whose kith and kins are practising in the High Court or are working in Advocate Generals office; (ii) Direct the Senior Advocates elevated to the Bench, either to refund the fees charged with interest or direct the senior advocates of the petitioners choice to argue his case free of any charges, and (iii) Direction for transfer of Judges be made.

2. Succinctly concluding from the warp and weft of the petition for disposing the petition, the following facts can be woven from the point of view of the petitioner. The petitioner averred that he engaged one of the respondents, to file a writ petition challenging the removel of his son from the post of a Judicial Officer i.e. Subordinate Judge. The respondent later elevated to bench and did not file the writ petition. and advised to wait, as he told the petitioner that since in view of talk he had with a named Judge who was against the petitioners son, the petitioner could not get relief till the named Judge is on the Bench. It is averred that on his elevati