SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Jeet Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ganga Phal – Respondent
Satish Kumar Mittal, J.
1. The legal representatives of appellant Jeet Ram, who had died on 5.4.1991, during the pendency of this Regular Second Appeal, filed by him have filed this application for re-calling the order dated 15.1.1998, passed by this Court, whereby the application (C.M. No. 4681-C of 1997) filed by them under Order 22, Rules 44, 9, and 11 C.P.C. for substituting them as legal representatives of deceased Jeet Ram appellant, after condoning the delay and setting aside the abatement of the appeal, was dismissed in their absence.
2. It has been stated in the application that when the aforesaid application i.e. C.M. No. 4681-C of 1997 was called for hearing on 15.1.1998, counsel for the applicants was busy in arguments before a Division Bench, therefore, he could not appear at the relevant time. It has been further stated that in the order dated 15.1.1998, it has been mentioned that the applicants did not seek the condonation of delay in filing the application for setting aside the abatement of the appeal, whereas, a specific prayer was made in the application for condoning the delay in filing the application. It has been further stated that case of the applican
Mithailal Dalsangar Singh V. Annabvai Devram Kini
N. Balakrishnan V. M. Krishnamurthy
Ram Nath Sao Alias Ram Nath Sahu And Ors. V. Gobardhan Sao And Ors.
Rama Ravalu Gavade V. Sataba Gavadu Gavade
Sardar Amarjit Singh Kalra (Dead) By Lrs And Ors. V. Pramod Gupta (Dead) By Lrs And Ors.
Sital Prasad Saxena (Dead) By Lrs V. Union Of India And Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.