SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1468

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Jeet Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ganga Phal – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. The legal representatives of appellant Jeet Ram, who had died on 5.4.1991, during the pendency of this Regular Second Appeal, filed by him have filed this application for re-calling the order dated 15.1.1998, passed by this Court, whereby the application (C.M. No. 4681-C of 1997) filed by them under Order 22, Rules 44, 9, and 11 C.P.C. for substituting them as legal representatives of deceased Jeet Ram appellant, after condoning the delay and setting aside the abatement of the appeal, was dismissed in their absence.

2. It has been stated in the application that when the aforesaid application i.e. C.M. No. 4681-C of 1997 was called for hearing on 15.1.1998, counsel for the applicants was busy in arguments before a Division Bench, therefore, he could not appear at the relevant time. It has been further stated that in the order dated 15.1.1998, it has been mentioned that the applicants did not seek the condonation of delay in filing the application for setting aside the abatement of the appeal, whereas, a specific prayer was made in the application for condoning the delay in filing the application. It has been further stated that case of the applican
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top