SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1166

S.S.SARON
Surinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Rattan Lal – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Saron, J.

1. CM. 8196-CII of 2005 in C.R. 6463 of 2001, CM. 15946-CI1 of 2005 in C.R. 3447 of 2001, CM. 11452-11 of 2005 in C.R. 833 of 2002. This order will dispose of the above mentioned three CMs which have been filed during the pendency of the revision petitions as there is common question of law involved.CM. 8196 CII of 2005. This CM has been filed by the appellant (landlord-respondent in the petition) seeking vacation of the interim stay granted by this Court pending revision petition. The landlord filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (Act - for short) seeking ejectment of the tenant-non applicant (petitioner) from S.C.F. 84, Section 26, Grain Market, Chandigarh, on the ground that the tenant had changed the user of the demised premises from grain shop to selling tea. In view of this, the Estate Officer, Chandigarh Administration, had initiated proceedings for misuse of the demised premises and had resumed the building vide order dated 8.10.1991. Further revision and appeal against the said order had been dismissed. The other ground for seeking ejectment of the tenant was non-payment of rent and also that the landlo























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top