SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 911

AJAY K.MITTAL
Girdhari Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ritesh Mahajan – Respondent


Judgment

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.

1. Respondent-landlord, Ritesh Majahan filed an eviction application under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 inter alia, on the grounds of non-payment of arrears of rent, bonafide requirements of the premises in dispute, sub-letting and making alterations etc. The petitioner herein contested the application denying the averments made therein and al:o denying the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties.

2. Respondent No. 1 while appearing as his own witness as AW-4 tendered his evidence by way of an affidavit appending therewith photostat copies of certain documents Exhibits AW-4/1 to AW-4/7, which according to the petitioner-tenant were not admissible in evidence. The petitioner, therefore, filed an application for de-exhibiting the said documents on the ground that the same could not be exhibited under the law.

3. Learned Rent Controller after hearing counsel for the parties in order dated 21.3.2005 observed, "this Court is of considered opinion that the decision of this application and the objection of the respondent is kept open and will be deiced at the time of final arguments." It is this order which th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top