SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 122

V.M.JAIN
Gurdeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is a petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. filed by the accused petitioner, seeking quashment of the order dated 6-9-1999 passed by the Sessions Judge, Sirsa setting aside the order dated 14-10-1998 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirsa vide which the Criminal complaint was dismissed for want of prosecution.

2. The facts which are necessary for the decision of the present petition are that State of Haryana through Drugs Inspector, Sirsa had filed a criminal complaint dated 7-9-1988 under the provisions of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules of 1945 framed under the aforesaid Act against the accused petitioner Gurdeep Singh, copy Annexure P-5. The case was still at the initial stage when the said criminal complaint was dismissed for want of prosecution by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirsa, vide order dated 14-10-1998, as no one was present on behalf of the complainant-State of Haryana, when the case was called for hearing. Aggrieved against the said order dated 14-10-1998 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirsa, State of Haryana through Drugs Inspector filed revision petition against the said order before the Sessions Court. The learned S



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top