SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 326

IQBAL SINGH
Kewal Singh And Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Kanti Pal And Ors. – Respondent


Judgment

Iqbal Singh, J.

1. A civil suit for permanent injunction in respect of the land in dispute was filed by the plaintiff-respondent Kantipal against Kewal Singh and others. In the said suit, an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) was filed by the plaintiff-respondent alleging therein that he is in cultivating possession of the suit land, but the revenue entries in the Jamabandi for the year 1975-76 depict wrong picture. Further, it is his case that in the year 1995, the legal heirs of Dig Pal raised claim on the basis of wrong entries in the revenue record, consequent whereupon, Subhash Chander had to file a suit for permanent injunction and declaration. In that suit, legal heirs of Yash Pal, Sat Pal and Dig Pal were declared as owners vide judgment and decree dated 19th February, 1997 passed by the Court of Smt. H.K. Randhawa, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar. It has been further stated that the plaintiff-respondent is cultivating the suit land through his agents, who are none else but defendant Nos. 9 to 11. Defendant Nos. 1 to 8, on the strength of wrong entries in the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top