SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 932

R.L.ANAND
Anil Hada – Appellant
Versus
Indian Acrylics Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment

1. By this order I dispose of six criminal revisions No.514 of 1998 titled anil Hada V/s. Indian Acrylics Ltd. , No.515 of 1998 (same title) No.516 of 1998 (same title)517 of 1998 (same title) Nos.638 and 639 of 1998 (same title) as in the opinion of this court all the six revisions can be disposed of by one order as common questions of law and fact are involved in the same.

2. Notice in four petition Nos.514 to 517 of 1998 was given by the Court but no notice has been given to the respondent in petition Nos.638 and 639 of 1998 as I intend to dispose of these two petitions in limine.

3. The facts have been gathered from criminal Revision No.514 of 1998 for the adjudication of the controversy in dispute.

4. A complaint was filed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by M/s Indian Acrylics Ltd. against M/s Rama fibers Ltd. and 11 others including the present petitioner Shri Anil Hada, who was the director the said Company and accused Shri R:k. Sharma, who, according to the complainant was Vice-President of the said Company. The present petitioner was summoned as an accused by the learned Magistrate 1st Class, chandigarh, Petitioner Shri Anil Hada filed an applic













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top