SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 484

V.S.AGGARWAL
Jagjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mithoo Singh – Respondent


Judgment

V.S.Aggarwal, J.

1. The present revision petition has been filed by Jagjit Singh and others (hereinafter described as the petitioners) directed against the order passed by the learned District Judge, Faridkot dated 9.6.1994. By virtue of the impugned order the learned trial court had dismissed the application filed seeking amendment of the written statement.

2. The relevant facts are that respondent Mithoo Singh had filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance and in the alternative the suit for recovery of Rs. 1,76,000/- against Kartar Singh. During the pendency of the suit, Kartar Singh had expired and the present petitioners were arrayed as legal representatives on 6.9.1992. One of the issues as a result of the defence of deceased Kartar Singh framed was "whether the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the suit land by way of specific performance of agreement". The learned trial Court with respect to the said issue held that land was not ancestral qua defendant Kartar Singh and that the respondent-plaintiff is entitled to the specific performance of agreement. Besides the said findings and the other conclusions arrived at which are not relevant for purpo


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top