SWATANTER KUMAR
Jaspal Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Hazara Singh – Respondent
Swatanter Kumar, J.
1. Sainder Kaur filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure for being impleaded as a party in the suit bearing No. 658 of 28.1995 pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana. This application was allowed by the learned trial Court, vide order dated 17th July, 1997, which is impugned by the plaintiff in the suit in this revision petition.
2. Jaspal Kaur had filed a suit for declaration claiming that she is owner in possession of the property bearing No. 84-J, Sarabanagar, Ludhiana. It was further averred in the plaint that the said plaintiff had perfected her title by way of adverse possession besides other grounds stated in the plaint. This suit was contested by Hazara Singh who did not refut the title of the petitioner over the property.
3. During the pendency of the suit, applicant Sainder Kaur filed the present application primarily on the fact that M/s Blunder Steel Industries and Mr. H.S. Bhinder had obtained loan from the Syndicate Bank. The account became irregular and the bank brought a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,93,398/- titled as Syndicate Bank v. Bhinder Steel Industries and Ors., which was dec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.