SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 235

SWATANTER KUMAR
Jaspal Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Hazara Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Swatanter Kumar, J.

1. Sainder Kaur filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure for being impleaded as a party in the suit bearing No. 658 of 28.1995 pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana. This application was allowed by the learned trial Court, vide order dated 17th July, 1997, which is impugned by the plaintiff in the suit in this revision petition.

2. Jaspal Kaur had filed a suit for declaration claiming that she is owner in possession of the property bearing No. 84-J, Sarabanagar, Ludhiana. It was further averred in the plaint that the said plaintiff had perfected her title by way of adverse possession besides other grounds stated in the plaint. This suit was contested by Hazara Singh who did not refut the title of the petitioner over the property.

3. During the pendency of the suit, applicant Sainder Kaur filed the present application primarily on the fact that M/s Blunder Steel Industries and Mr. H.S. Bhinder had obtained loan from the Syndicate Bank. The account became irregular and the bank brought a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,93,398/- titled as Syndicate Bank v. Bhinder Steel Industries and Ors., which was dec
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top