SAT PAL, S.S.SUDHALKAR
Nirmal Singh Alias Manbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
SAT PAL, J.
1. By this judgment, we are disposing of Murder Reference No. 3 of 1996 and Criminal Appeal No. 261-DB of 1996 as both arise from the same judgment, dated 30th April, 1996, passed by Sessions Judge, Jind. By this judgment, the learned Sessions Judge convicted the appellants under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25 and 27 of the Indian Arms Act. Under Section 302, IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to death and also to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-. The sentence of death is subject to the confirmation by this Court. Under Section 307, IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and also to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- Under Section 25 of the Arms Act, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and has further been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned Sessions Judge further ordered that in default of payment of fine on any count, the appellant would further undergo imprisonment for a period of three months. All the substantive sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.
2. In this case, F.I.R
Ananta Mahanto V/s. State Of Orissa
Binay Kumar V/s. State Of Bihar
Umashankar Panda V/s. State Of Madhya Pradesh
Vadivelu Thevar V/s. State Of Madras
Bachan Singh V/s. State Of Punjab
Dalip Singh V/s. State Of Punjab
Division Bench Judgment Of The Allahabad High Court In Tahsildar Singh V/s. State
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.