SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 643

G.R.MAJITHIA, N.K.SODHI
Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
Labour Commissioner – Respondent


Judgment

N.K.Sodhi, J.

1. Whether the residuary provisions of Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 providing a period of three years of limitation apply to a reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act) and if they do not apply, whether delay is a valid ground to decline a reference under Section 10 of the Act are in essence the two questions of law which we are called upon to decide. The Motion Bench while admitting this petition has, of course, formulated the following six questions but when examined in their true perspective answers to these two questions will cover all of them:

1. Whether termination of services can be challenged after expiry of 3 years by raising an industrial dispute and seeking reference to Labour Court for its decision?.

2. Whether Articles 137 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 , would be applicable in case of dismissal of an employee who challenged it by raising an industrial dispute and dismissal can be challenged after expiry of three years ?.

3. Whether Articles 137 would be applicable to Labour Court or to Industrial dispute or Tribunals ?.

4. Whether the State can refuse to make reference to Labour Co





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top