SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 790

V.K.JHANJI
Nirmal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kuldip Raj – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Jhanji, J.

1. This is landlords revision directed against the orders of the Authorities below dismissing bis petition for ejectment on the ground of personal necessity. According to the petitioner, the wife of the petitioner, Smt. Kulwant Kaur, is stated to be the owner of House No. 5-C, Fairland Colony, Fatehgarh Road, Amritsar. The building is alleged to be residential one and out of this, one room was rented out to the respondent at a rent of Rs. 500/-per month. Ejectment was sought on the ground that he has failed to pay the arrears of rent, . w.e.f 1-6-1982 to 28-2-1983, as well as on the ground that the room in occupation of the respondent is required for use and occupation by the family members of the petitioner.

2. The ejectment petition was contested by the tenant, who in his written statement admitted that Smt. Kulwant Kaur, wife of the petitioner, is the owner of the property. He therefore, denied that there was any relationship of landlord and tenant between the petitioner and the respondent. The rent was claimed to be Rs. 100/- per month and not Rs. 500/- per month as alleged by the petitioner. The respondent denied that the property is residential one. He









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top