SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 437

A.P.CHOWDHRI
Samiti Khanna – Appellant
Versus
Aroon Khanna – Respondent


Judgment

A.P.Chowdhri, J.

1. This appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated January 8, 1991, of the Additional District Judge; Karnal, allowing respondents petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. Aroon Khanna respondent married Samiti Khanna appellant on February 13 1974. A male child named Amar was born to the couple within a year of the marriage on December 21, 1974. Aroon Khanna lost his father Vishawanath Khanna when the former was only about 6 years old. Vishwanath Khanna along with his wife Smt. Raj Khanna and two children Aroon and a daughter Sushma was living jointly with his brother Pran Nath Khanna and his wife Shakuntla Khanna. The two brothers Vishawanath Khanna and Pran Nath Khanna were joint in business in equal shares. After the death of Vishwanath Khanna, his widow Smt. Raj Khanna and her two children continued to live jointly with Pran Nath Khanna and his wife. At the time of marriage of Aroon Khanna thus they were living jointly with Pran Nath Khanna and his wife who have no issue of their own. Samitis elder sister Shashi is married to Smt. Shakuntla Khannas nephew Jagdish Khullar. In other words




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top