SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(P&H) 8

HARNAM SINGH
Nathu Ram V. Godse – Appellant
Versus
Crown – Respondent


Judgment

Harnam Singh, J.

1. Nathu Ram V. Godse has been found guilty by-Shri Atma Charan, I. C, S. Judge, Special Court, Delhi, under Section 120-B, Penal Code read with sec. 502 of the Code, under sec. 19 (c), Arms Act Cr in the alternative under Section 114, Penal Code read with Section 19 (c), Arms Act,, under Section 19 (f), Arum Act, under Section 5, Explosive Substances Act Cr in the alternative under Section 5, Explosive Substances Act read with Section 6 of the Act, under Section 4 (b), Explosive Substances Act read with Section 6 of the Act, under Sec. 8, Explosive Sub-stances Act read with Section 6 of the Act, under Section 115, Penal Code read with Section 302 of the Code and under Section 302, Penal Code and has been sentenced (1) to two years rigorous imprisonment under Section 19 (c), Arms Act, Cr in the alternative under Section 114, Penal Code read with Section 19 (c), Arms Act, (2) to two years rigorous imprisonment under Section 19 (f), Arms Act, (3) to three years rigorous imprisonment under Section 5, Explosive Substances Act Cr in the alternative under Section 6, Explosive Substances Act read with Section 6 of the Act, (4) to five years rigorous imprisonment u




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top