SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1104

VIJENDER JAIN, RAJESH BINDAL, H.S.BHALLA
Sirandip Singh Panag – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


For the Petitioners in CWP Nos. 16616, 6942, 20663,
17495 of 2002, 1625, 1626, 1726, 2361, 3541, 3542,
10165, 12248, 1972, 2011 of 2003 and
C.M.No.7067 of 2008 in CWP No.12248 of 2003:Mr. Gurminder Singh, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CWP No. 2203 of 2003:Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate.
For the Petitioners in CWP Nos.16941, 17309, 17961,
17963 of 2002 and 2810 of 2003: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal,
Sr. Advocate with
Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate.
For the Petitioners in CWP Nos.16943 & 17310 of 2002:Mr. Jatin Salwan, Advocate.
For the Petitioners in CWP Nos. 16615 and 16870 of 2003: Mr. R.C. Chatrath and
Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocates.
For the Petitioner in CWP No. 18506 of 2002:Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the petitioner in CWP No.18950 of 2002:Mr. K.L. Goel, Advocate.
For the Petitioner No.1:Mr. R.K. Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Chopra, Advocate.
For the Petitioner Nos.2 to 4 in CWP No.17347 of 2003:Mr. Vivek Sharma, Sr. Advocate
For the State of Punjab:Mr. Amol Rattan Singh, Additional Advocate General.
For the High Court:Mr. Karminder Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

H.S. Bhalla, J.:- Through this common judgment, we shall be disposing of number of petitions filed by the petitioners belonging to 1998-2001 batches, being Civil Writ Petition Nos. 1625, 1626, 1726, 2203, 2361, 3541, 3542, 10165, 12248 of 2003 and Civil Misc. Application No.7067 of Z008 in Civil Writ Petition No.12248 of 2003 (10 petitions) relating to 1998 batch as also 09 petitions, being Civil Writ Petition Nos. 16615, 16616, 16870, 16941, 16942, 16943, 17309, 17310 of 2002 and 2810 of 2003 in respect of 1999 batch and 05 petitions, being Civil Writ Petition Nos.17961, 17963, 18506, 18950 and 20663 of 2002 of 2003 pertaining to 2000 batch and 04 petitions, being Civil Writ Petition Nos. 17495 of 2002, 1972, 2011 and 17347 of 2003 relating to 2001 batch together since common questions of fact and law involved therein are identical in nature. However, it is apt to mention here that Writ Petition (C) No. 14 of 2004 filed by Dinesh Kumar Mittal and Suresh Kumar Goyal directly before the Hon’ble Supreme Court has been remanded to this Court, but the said file has not been received. They have filed Civil Misc. Application No.7067 of 2008 in Civil Writ Petition No.12248 of 200
































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top