SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1712

AJAI LAMBA
Rulda Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurdip Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Ms. Sangita Dhanda, Advocate.
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Ajai Lamba, J.:-This First Appeal against Order is directed against order dated 5.2.2007, passed by the Guardian Judge, Ludhiana.

2. Respondent No.1-Gurdip Singh, father of Harpreet Singh, filed an application under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (for short ‘the Act’) praying for custody of the minor; namely Harpreet Singh, his son. Harpreet Singh was born on 5.7.1996. At the point in time when the application was filed, the minor was in the custody of his maternal grand parents; namely Rulda Singh (appellant) and Karnail Kaur (respondent No.2).

3. The grounds taken by respondent No.1, in brief, were that he is the natural guardian and had the right to claim title of being a guardian and, therefore, was entitled to the custody of the minor. The maternal grand parents were aged persons.

4. The application was opposed by the appellant and respondent No.2 on the ground that Karamjit Kaur, mother of the minor, had been ill treated by respondent No.1 and his relatives. No proper medical aid was given to her during her life time and, therefore, she had to be removed to her paternal home along with the minor. She, however, could not be cured and after prolonged illn














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top