SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2140

2010(3) LAW HERALD (P&H) 2361
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
Criminal Appeal No.1891-SB of 2002
Manjit Singh & Ors.
v.
State of Punjab
{Decided on 28/07/2010}

Advocates:
For the Appellants:Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Advocate.
For the Respondent-State:Mr. J.S. Bhullar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.306, 304 r/w S.34-A--Evidence Act, 1872, S.32--Dying Declaration--Culpabable homicide--Convicted Abetment to suicide--Deceased was living with her parents in their house for last seven years--There was no demand of dowry soon before death--Rather, one month before occurrence, accused husband along with his friend had gone to house of his in-laws to bring his wife, which has been termed as an attempt to forcibly take away wife from house of in-laws--According to PW-1 and PW-2, marriage was six years old and one of prime reasons for causing harassment was that deceased had failed to conceive and give birth to a child--Whereas, dying declaration states that husband used to level wild allegations--Taking entire factual matrix into consideration, it will be difficult to say that demand of dowry was cause of death of deceased or demand of dowry led deceased to commit suicide, as neither demand was soon before death nor according to prosecution evidence, was only reason for commission of suicide--Marriage was six years old and no child was born, it can be safely assumed that deceased was harassed, tortured and thrown out of house for not giving birth to a child--Thus, offence, if any, will fall under Section 306 IPC and not under Section 304-B IPC--Furthermore, parents of accused were alive--Therefore, uncle and aunt have nothing to gain form demand of dowry--Even though, specific accusation has been made in dying declaration, no such specific utterance has been made by PW-1 and PW-2 against these two accused--Therefore, benefit of doubt ought to accrue to appellants ‘K’ and ‘R’ are acquitted of charges--Appellant husband acquitted of charge under Section 304-B and held guilty under Section 306 IPC. (Para 22)

       (B) Evidence Act, 1872, S.32--Dying declaration--Non-examination of doctor who declared her fit--Effect--Magistrate, who being a disinterested person had obtained opinion of Doctor and had satisfied himself that deceased was in a fit state of mind to make dying declaration, and thereafter had recorded dying declaration--No material or circumstance to suspect that Magistrate had any animus against accused or was in any way interested for fabricating dying declaration--Question of doubt, on dying declaration recorded by Magistrate does not arise. (Para 28)

       (C) Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.306--Abetment to suicide--Totality of circumstances is to be taken into consideration--Deceased was thrown out of her matrimonial home--She consistently reminded that she had not given birth to a child--Dying declaration depicts a grievance against husband that he levelled vulgar and base allegations--This only show depravity on part of husband to act foul against wife--Held, that this conduct of husband led deceased to commit suicide. (Para 30)

       (D) Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.306--Conviction--Sentence--Occurrence had taken place in year 1994--Accused has already suffered mental pain and agony of a protracted trial--Taking totality of circumstances into consideration, sentence of four RI will serve ends of justice. (Para 33)

       

JUDGMENT

Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.:- Manjit Singh-husband, Kulwant Singh-uncle (chacha), Ravinder Kaur-aunt (chachi) along with Gurdip Singh-a neighbour (friend) of husband, were nominated as accused in case FIR No. 32 dated 28.07.1994 registered at Police Station Khamanon. They were tried by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, who vide his impugned judgment dated 31st October, 2002, acquitted Gurdip Singh accused, but held the other three guilty of an offence punishable under Section 304-B read with Section 34 IPC. Vide a separate order of even date, Manjit Singh was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years, whereas, Kulwant Singh and Ravinder Kaur, who were uncle and aunt of Manjit Singh, were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years. All the three accused were further ordered to pay Rs.3000/- each as fine and in default of payment of fine sentence of three months rigorous imprisonment was imposed.

2. Aggrieved against the same, the three convicts have filed the present appeal.

3. On 28th July, 1994, HC Piara Singh PW-3, having learnt that Balwinder Kaur wife of Manjit Singh, resident of village Begowal, Tehsil Doraha, District Ludhiana, was admitted in the PGIMER Chandigarh as a case of poisoning, moved an application Ex.PA to the Executive Magistrate, Chandigarh, requesting that the statement of Balwinder Kaur be recorded. Ashwani Kumar, Executive Magistrate, U.T. Chandigarh, on receipt of the application, reached PGIMER Chandigarh and on the same day, i.e. 28th July, 1994 at about 12.30 p.m. sought opinion of the Doctor vide Ex.PA/1 regarding fitness of Balwinder Kaur. Dr.Vara Prasad, on the same day at about 12.40 p.m. declared the patient fit to make statement. The Executive Magistrate, having satisfied himself that Balwinder Kaur was conscious to make statement, recorded her statement Ex.PA/3, which not only constituted a dying declaration but on the basis of the same FIR Ex.PW-7/B was registered. Since much of the arguments have been advanced towards the dying declaration, its admissibility and competence of the deceased to make statement, it will be apposite here to reproduce the translation of the FIR as noticed by the trial Judge in para 2 of the impugned judgment, which reads as under:

“This is my 6th year of marriage and I do not have any issue. I reside with my husband and with ‘Chacha’ (uncle) and ‘Chachi’ (aunt). My uncle Kulwant and aunt Ravinder Kaur asked me to bring Rs.10,000/- from my parents and in pursuance thereof I brought Rs.5000/- from my parents and handed over the same to them, but my uncle kept on hurling abuses to me and my husband. My aunt gave me beatings. I returned to my parental house. However, my mother again left me at my matrimonial home. I was given severe beatings by my husband and my aunt about 5 months back. I had been given beatings several times even prior to that and had been given beatings for about 4-5 years. I received serious injuries just above my eye and the said injury had to be stitched. At that time I was also threatened and told that I should tell everybody that the said injury had been received by the handle of the hand pump. Similarly, I had come back to my parental home about a month earlier. My husband along with Gurdeep Singh who is son of our neighbour had come to forcibly take me away, but due to sudden presence of Palo from the neighbourhood my husband and Gurdeep went away. My husband used to level lowly allegations against me. As such on being fed up I have consumed a tablet which is used in preserving wheat. I have consumed the said tablet at my parental home because my husband used to come to me and harass me. I have heard my statement which is correct.”

4. It has come in the evidence that on 28th July, 1994, ASI Nasib Singh PW-7 was posted as Assistant Sub Inspector at Police Station Kheri Naud Singh. He received statement Ex.PA/3 of Balwinder Kaur, bearing endorsement Ex.PW-7/



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top